LSUA identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and for
all administrative and educational support services units as part of
its strategic planning process, and assesses them through its
institutional effectiveness process. Planning has occurred at LSUA, in
one form or another, since the university was created in 1960. LSUA has
had a formal, structured institutional effectiveness process since 1993
[1]
. As a result of receiving approval
from the Louisiana Legislature on June 5, 2001 to convert from a
two-year to a four-year institution, LSUA undertook a major strategic
planning initiative in 2001-2002, in which a new mission, vision,
university goals and unit outcomes were developed in preparation for
offering LSUA’s first upper-level courses and bachelor’s degree
programs in Fall 2003. A less intense strategic planning process
took place during 2003-2004, resulting in the current Strategic Plan [2]
.
A description of LSUA’s planning and assessment process is provided in Policy Statement 225 [1]
.
The strategic planning process takes place every two years and provides
for input from students, prospective students, faculty, staff, and
community members. As a result of the strategic planning process,
revisions may be made to LSUA’s vision statement, mission statement and
institutional goals. Once the mission, vision, and institutional goals
have been established, each administrative and support services unit
develops a unit statement of purpose [3]
and unit outcomes. The unit’s purpose and outcomes must support one or
more of the institutional goals. Similarly, for each certificate,
associate degree and bachelor’s degree program, as well as for
developmental education and general education, appropriate faculty
develop expected educational or learning outcomes. All statements of
purpose and outcomes are reviewed by the Institutional Effectiveness
Committee [4]
for appropriateness.
Outcomes for all administrative and support services units and for all
educational programs are listed according to which university goal they
support on pages 13-33 in the LSUA Strategic Plan 2004-2006 [5]
. Student learning outcomes may be found under Goal 6.
All units at LSUA assess achievement of unit outcomes through LSUA’s
institutional effectiveness process. During each assessment cycle
[6]
(a two-year period), every unit
assesses achievement of its outcomes. Typically a unit has three to six
outcomes. Similarly, up to six outcomes are assessed for each
degree and certificate program and for each developmental education
program. For general education, all nine outcomes are assessed in each
cycle.
All units document their outcomes assessment on Annual Assessment Forms via an online database [7]
.
At the beginning of each assessment cycle, the unit completes one of
these forms for each outcome being assessed. On the form, the unit must
describe the methods it will use to assess achievement of each outcome
and the criterion or measure of achievement. These forms are then
submitted to the Coordinator for Planning and Assessment, who is
responsible, in conjunction with the appropriate vice chancellor,
for insuring that high standards for achievement have been set and
assessment methods are reasonable and varied. After approval, the unit
proceeds to carry out its planned assessments and report the results.
Assessment and reporting are done annually, but the unit has the entire
two-year cycle to achieve the outcome. Results of the assessment are
reported at the end of each academic year on the Annual Assessment
Forms [7]
. The Director of Institutional
Research and Effectiveness also summarizes the results of campus
assessments that support each institutional goal in the Annual
Assessment Report Card [8]
.
When assessment results indicate that an outcome is not being
achieved, unit personnel (appropriate faculty in the case of learning
outcomes) meet and discuss actions that can be taken so that the
outcome will be achieved in the future. Units must document these
planned actions in the final section (Section III) of their Annual
Assessment Forms [7]
. This planned use of
results for improvement is also submitted to the Coordinator for
Planning and Assessment, who, in conjunction with the appropriate vice
chancellor, must insure that the planned actions are adequate and
appropriate.
Over the approximately 10 years that LSUA has used its current
assessment process, a variety of improvements have resulted from the
process. For example, because assessments showed that developmental
English students were not doing as well in their subsequent credit
courses in composition as were students who placed directly into
freshman composition, the English faculty developed a new developmental
English course so that students who entered LSUA with very poor writing
skills could begin at a lower level and spend two semesters in
developmental English. The faculty also changed the textbooks used for
developmental English and changed some of the teaching emphasis. The
English faculty are also now working much more closely with adjunct
faculty to insure that all students in developmental English receive
similar instruction and are subject to similar expectations.
Additionally, students must now earn a C or better in each
developmental English course before being allowed to enroll in the next
level of English.
In another example from academics, performance of LSUA graduates on
the ACT CAAP exam in Mathematics has been slightly below the desired
outcome level for several years. Additionally, a locally-developed
mathematics exam showed graduates to have poor skills at working word
problems. As a result of these assessments, the Mathematics faculty
have changed the requirement for successfully exiting the second
developmental math course and College Algebra from a D to a C, have
incorporated more word problems into developmental mathematics courses
(which approximately 90% of LSUA freshmen must take) and have
incorporated use of graphing calculators in all sections of College
Algebra.
There are other examples from academics as well. All LSUA graduates
now must either pass a computer literacy exam or take a 1-hour course.
This requirement was instituted because surveys of graduates indicated
fewer graduates than desired had any opportunity to learn certain
computer skills, particularly with spreadsheets, as they completed
their degree programs. History faculty developed guidelines for
teaching courses in western civilization and American history so that
students across all course sections would have a more consistent
educational experience. Science faculty have been asked to revise their
courses to incorporate more exposure and practice for students relative
to use of the library, use of the scientific process, and ability to
reason and communicate logically.
There also have been many improvements to administrative and support
services functions as a result of LSUA’s assessment process. Facility
Services has increased its training of staff as a result of assessment
that showed the unit was not meeting benchmarks for such training.
Facility Services now conducts frequent short training sessions as the
staff begins their work day. The printed schedule available to students
each semester was changed greatly as a result of student
dissatisfaction with the previous format. Orientation sessions for new
and transfer students have been modified as well in response to
findings from assessments. The Counseling Center has increased
advertising for its services after assessments showed fewer students
were aware of and used the services than was desired. Many changes have
occurred at the Bookstore, including longer hours of operation, changes
in book ordering procedures, customer service training for staff,
and finally outsourcing to Follett as a result of assessments that
showed dissatisfaction with that unit.
Examination of many years of assessment records would be necessary
to give a complete picture of assessment at LSUA. In any given
assessment cycle, most units achieve most of the outcomes they set for
themselves. However, when assessment is an ongoing process, all units,
at some point, discover areas where improvement is needed and take
steps to make those improvements.